Sent
to The Star, Johannesburg Wed
20/07/2011 09:21, Published as “Why only churches?” in The Star (South Africa);
July 21, 2011; 318 words
In
the comments on the Municipal Property Rates Amendment Bill, it has been
pointed out that a part of the bill is designed to kill the rental housing market,
and is probably unconstitutional.
There
is another important part of what will become the Act, that is equally
unconstitutional, and has escaped notice. The current Act forces municipalities to not
charge rates on "places of public worship". Despite submissions, the amendment makes no
provision to remove this zero rating from the new Act.
The
Bill of Rights, clause 9 (Equality) says (1) Everyone is equal before the law. (2) Equality includes the full and equal
enjoyment of all rights and freedoms. (3) The state may not unfairly
discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on any grounds, including
religion.
The
zero rating of property used for religious purposes constitutes unfair
discrimination in favour of those who belong to religious bodies. What is the
justification for this? Are the gods
short of money? Why should religion be
favoured over other recreational activities, even over schools and crèches,
old-age homes, and other worthwhile endeavours?
Comments
must be faxed to (012) 334-4811 or emailed to mpra@cogta.gov.za by 22 July 2011.
