Sent to "The Star, Johannesburg" on Sat 02/10/2010 22:14, Published Tue Oct 5 2010, except
for the sentence in blue.
We have a nice crop of responses to my letter of
Sept 27 2010 criticising the Bible. How sad
that the critics appear not to have read the "Good Book" itself!
Jaco Bruwer (Sept 29, "There's no reason to
trash biblical explanation") and Niki Christie (Sept 30, "Being sure
of what we hope for") imply that the "days" referred to in the
Creation Myth are not 24-hour days but "ages".
Please read Genesis 1: It says the world was created in literal,
24-hour days, made clear by repeating "and there was evening, and there
was morning" for each day. Why
evening first? Because in those days
(and still in Jewish tradition), the day was taken to start at sunset.
Daniel Spangenberg (Sept 29, "Confusing
personal view with fact") can observe for himself that the earth did NOT
arise in 144 hours by looking at geological processes, the speed of formation
of elements in stars, and other natural phenomena. These have convinced scientists that the
six-day creation story is just a myth. This is scientific fact, not just my opinion.
Jaco Bruwer agrees, saying "the earth's
atmosphere cleaned up over millions of years".
Niki Christie says that it all has to start
somewhere.
In a paragraph edited out of my original letter,
I pre-empted this by saying: "If some god were the creator, who created
the god? If that god was always there,
why not cut out the middleman and accept that the universe itself was always
there? The simpler explanation is the
most likely, by Occam's Razor."
If Niki Christie would like examples of
contradictions in the Bible, she should compare the two creation sequences in
Genesis 1 and 2, and the differing stories in Matthew and Luke about the birth
of Jesus and particularly their radically conflicting genealogies of Jesus. I can expand on this in a later letter.
My point is that the Bible is not true. Hence it is not possible that it is the work
of a truthful divine creator.
Conclusion: The Bible is fiction steeped in the
mythology of its time. It is no more reliable a handbook –on god or
anything else– than Grimm's Fairy Tales.
No comments:
Post a Comment